Composition for solar cell sealing film, method for producing same and solar cell sealing film

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides a composition for a solar cell sealing film prepared by mixing an ethylene-α-olefin copolymer (m-LLDPE) polymerized using a metallocene catalyst and other polymers as resin components, wherein the composition has the same processability as a composition containing m-LLDPE alone and provides a solar cell sealing film having the same transparency as the case where m-LLDPE is used alone. A composition for a solar cell sealing film comprising m-LLDPE and low-density polyethylene (LDPE), wherein the weight average molecular weight of m-LLDPE (M w(m-LLDPE) ) is 200,000 or less, the weight average molecular weight of LDPE (M w(LDPE) ) is 250,000 or less, and the mass ratio of m-LLDPE to LDPE (m-LLDPE:LDPE) is in a range of 80:20 to 30:70, and a solar cell sealing film prepared using the same.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a composition used for forming a solar cell sealing film, and particularly to a composition comprising an ethylene-α-olefin copolymer polymerized by using a metallocene catalyst and other polymers, having excellent processability such as film formability and providing a sealing film excellent in transparency.

BACKGROUND ART

Conventionally, solar cell modules directly converting sunlight into electric energy have been widely used in view of effective use of resources and prevention of environmental pollution and developed for improving power generation efficiency, weather-resistance and reducing production cost.

A solar cell module is generally produced by laminating a front side transparent protecting member 11 such as a glass substrate, a front side sealing film 13A, solar cells 14 such as silicon crystal photovoltaic elements, a backside sealing film 13B and a backside protecting member (back cover) 12 in this order, as shown in FIG. 1, removing air under vacuum, and heating and pressurizing the stack to cure the front side sealing film 13A and the backside sealing film 13B through crosslinking, thereby adhering and integrating them.

In the solar cell module, a plurality of solar cells 14 mutually connected are used in order to obtain high electric power. To ensure insulation property of the solar cells 14, the solar cells are sealed with the sealing films 13A and 13B which have insulation properties.

In the meantime, development of thin-film solar cell modules prepared using thin-film solar cells such as a thin-film silicon solar cell, a thin-film amorphous silicon solar cell and a copper indium selenide (CIS) solar cell has been promoted. The thin-film solar cell module is produced by forming a photovoltaic element layer such as a semiconductor layer on a surface of a transparent substrate such as a glass substrate or a polyimide substrate by e.g., a chemical vapor deposition method, laminating a sealing film on the photovoltaic element layer and allowing them to adhere into one body.

Recently, a solar cell sealing material, which is formed of a composition comprising an ethylene-α-olefin copolymer polymerized by using a metallocene catalyst (hereinafter referred to also as m-LLDPE), has been developed (Patent Literature 1). A sealing material (described in Patent Literature 1) formed from a composition comprising m-LLDPE having predetermined physical properties forms crosslinkage in a relatively short time due to the presence of an organic peroxide and produces sufficient adhesivity. Thus, the solar cell module can be produced at low cost and have excellent transparency, flexibility and weather-resistance and expected to maintain a stable conversion efficiency for a long time.

PRIOR ART LITERATURE Patent Literature Patent Literature 1: JP A 2013-8980 SUMMARY OF INVENTION Problems to be Solved by the Invention

Since m-LLDPE is expensive, it has a problem in that the production cost of a solar cell sealing material per se increases. To reduce the cost of the sealing material, it is conceivable to blend other inexpensive polymers. Also in Patent Literature 1, it is described that a low-density polyethylene produced by a high pressure method can be added in an amount of 3 to 75 parts by weight to impart melt tension.

However, the present inventors found in their studies that a composition prepared by blending other polymers as a resin component into m-LLDPE is low in processability in producing a solar cell sealing film, compared to a composition containing m-LLDPE alone.

When a solar cell sealing film is produced from a resin composition, first, materials are mixed in a primary kneading step and thereafter, if necessary, the mixture is subjected to roll kneading in a secondary kneading step and then formed into a film by e.g., calendering or extrusion. In this case, since the dynamic viscoelasticity (can be evaluated based on elastic modulus) of the resin composition after the primary kneading step has a significant effect upon processability such as film formability in the film formation step, it is necessary to control the elastic modulus of the resin composition to fall within a predetermined range (referred to also as the processable elastic modulus range). Particularly in the calendering, the processable elastic modulus range is relatively narrow. Since the elastic modulus of a resin composition generally changes in accordance with the temperature, elastic modulus can be controlled by changing the temperature of the resin composition. However, in the film formation step, it is generally difficult to accurately control the temperature of a resin composition. Thus, if the temperature range (referred to also as the processable temperature range) in which the processable elastic modulus range can be obtained, is narrow, it becomes difficult to process a resin into a film in the film formation step. This is a problem. Furthermore, if the temperature, at which the processable elastic modulus range of a resin composition can be obtained, increases, energy cost increases. Besides this, the temperature sometimes exceeds the temperature control range of a film forming apparatus by a temperature controlling solvent, with the result that an existing apparatus may not be used.

It was found that a composition prepared by blending other polymers as a resin component into m-LLDPE has a problem in that processability of the composition deteriorates compared to the case containing m-LLDPE alone.

It was also found that a solar cell sealing film formed from such a mixed composition by e.g., calendering is low in transparency (can be evaluated based on light permeability) compared to the case containing m-LLDPE alone.

An object of the present invention is to provide a composition for a solar cell sealing film comprising a mixture of m-LLDPE and other polymers as a resin component, having processability equivalent to the composition containing m-LLDPE alone and providing a solar cell sealing film having transparency equivalent to a film formed of the composition containing m-LLDPE alone, and provide a method for producing the composition and the solar cell sealing film.

Means for Solving the Problems

The above object can be achieved by a composition for a solar cell sealing film comprising an ethylene-α-olefin copolymer (m-LLDPE) polymerized using a metallocene catalyst, and a low-density polyethylene (LDPE), in which the weight average molecular weight (M_(w(m-LLDPE))) of m-LLDPE is 200,000 or less, the weight average molecular weight (M_(w(LDPE))) of LDPE is 250,000 or less, and the mass ratio of the m-LLDPE to the LDPE (m-LLDPE:LDPE) is in a range of 80:20 to 30:70.

As m-LLDPE and LDPE to be blended in a composition for a solar cell sealing film, when the m-LLDPE and LDPE having the aforementioned weight average molecular weights are used in a blending ratio satisfying the aforementioned range, processability equivalent to a composition containing m-LLDPE alone can be obtained even if m-LLDPE and LDPE are used in combination. Thus, even if calendering is used for film formation, the film can be easily formed and the resultant solar cell sealing film can have transparency equivalent to the case of containing m-LLDPE alone.

Preferred embodiments of the composition for a solar cell sealing film of the present invention are as follows.

(1) The weight average molecular weight of the m-LLDPE is 100,000 to 200,000 and the weight average molecular weight of the LDPE is 50,000 to 250,000. It is possible to obtain a composition having high processability.

(2) The ratio (M_(w(LDPE))/M_(n(LDPE))) r which is the ratio of the weight average molecular weight of LDPE (M_(w(LDPE))) to the number average molecular weight of LDPE (M_(n(LDPE))), is 1.0 or more as large as the ratio (M_(w(m-LLDPE))/M_(n(m-LLDPE))), which is the ratio of the weight average molecular weight of m-LLDPE (M_(w(m-LLDPE))) to the number average molecular weight of m-LLDPE (M The above ratio (M_(w)/M_(n)) represents a degree of a molecular weight distribution. Since the molecular weight distribution of m-LLDPE is generally narrow, the temperature range in which an elastic modulus changes tends to be narrow. Accordingly, if the molecular weight distribution of LDPE is large, the aforementioned processable temperature range can be broadened, with the result that processability can be further improved.

(3) The ratio (M_(w(LDPE))/M_(n(LDPE))), which is the ratio of the weight average molecular weight of LDPE (M_(w(LDPE))) to the number average molecular weight of LDPE (M_(n(LDPE))), is 3.30 or more, and the ratio (M_(w(m-LLDPE))/M_(n(m-LLDPE))), which is the ratio of the weight average molecular weight of m-LLDPE (M_(w(m-LLDPE))) to the number average molecular weight of m-LLDPE (M_(n(m-LLDPE))), is 2.25 or less.

(4) The average diameter of crystals in the composition is 1.0 μm or less. The transparency of the resultant solar cell sealing film can be improved.

(5) The temperature at which the storage elastic modulus of the composition is 100 kPa is 70 to 100° C., and the difference between the temperature at which the storage elastic modulus of the composition is 30 kPa and the temperature at which the storage elastic modulus of the composition is 100 kPa is 3.5° C. or more. If the composition has the properties defined by the above ranges, it can be said that the composition can be easily formed into a film by calendering, in other words, the composition is excellent in processability.

(6) An organic peroxide is further contained. The resultant solar cell sealing film can be improved in transparency.

(7) The organic peroxide is 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butylperoxy)hexane. This is a particularly effective organic peroxide.

The above object can be attained by a method for producing a composition (6) or (7) for a solar cell sealing film comprising an organic peroxide, including a step of preparing a masterbatch by mixing the organic peroxide with the LDPE as mentioned above and a step of mixing the masterbatch and the m-LLDPE as mentioned above. If a solar cell sealing film is produced from the composition obtained by this method, since the organic peroxide principally acts on the LDPE, the degree of crystallization can be efficiently reduced to obtain a solar cell sealing film having higher transparency.

The above object can be achieved by a solar cell sealing film formed from the composition for a solar cell sealing film of the present invention. The solar cell sealing film of the present invention is preferably formed by calendering. The solar cell sealing film of the present invention, since it is formed from the composition of the present invention, can be easily formed even by calendering and has high transparency.

Effects of Invention

According to the present invention, even if m-LLDPE and LDPE are blended in a composition for a solar cell sealing film, processability equivalent to a composition containing m-LLDPE alone can be obtained. Because of this, the film can be easily formed even by calendering and a solar cell sealing film can be obtained with transparency equivalent to in the case of containing m-LLDPE alone. Accordingly, it can be said that the solar cell sealing film of the present invention is high in quality and low in cost.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWING

FIG. 1 The FIGURE is a sectional view of a general solar cell module.

MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION Composition for Solar Cell Sealing Film

The composition for a solar cell sealing film of the present invention contains an ethylene-α-olefin copolymer (m-LLDPE) polymerized using a metallocene catalyst, and a low-density polyethylene (LDPE), in which the weight average molecular weight of the m-LLDPE (M_(w(m-LLDPE))) is 200,000 or less, the weight average molecular weight of the LDPE (M_(w(LDPE))) is 250,000 or less, and the mass ratio of the m-LLDPE to the LDPE (m-LLDPE:LDPE) is in a range of 80:20 to 30:70.

When a solar cell sealing film is produced as mentioned above by using a resin composition, first, a primary kneading step of mixing materials by use of, for example, a twin-screw kneader, is performed; and then, if necessary, a secondary kneading step such as roll kneading is performed and then the film is formed in accordance with calendering and extrusion. In this case, since dynamic viscoelasticity (can be evaluated based on elastic modulus) of the resin composition in a step such as the film forming step after the primary kneading step, has a significant effect upon processability such as film formability, it is necessary to control the elastic modulus of the resin composition to fall within a predetermined range (processable elastic modulus range). Particularly, to obtain satisfactory film formability in the calendering, the storage elastic modulus of the resin composition in the film formation step is preferably 30 to 100 kPa. Since the elastic modulus of a resin composition varies generally depending upon the temperature, the elastic modulus can be controlled by changing the temperature of the resin composition. Since the variation of the elastic modulus depending upon the temperature differs depending upon the resin composition, the temperature range (processable temperature range) at which the processable elastic modulus range can be obtained differs depending upon the resin composition. Generally in e.g., a film formation step, since it is difficult to accurately control the temperature of a resin composition, it is preferable that the processable temperature range (in other words, the difference between the temperature at which the storage elastic modulus of the composition is 30 kPa and the temperature at which the storage elastic modulus of the composition is 100 kPa) of a resin composition increases, and more specifically, 3.5° C. or more. As to the temperature at which the processable elastic modulus range can be obtained, if the temperature increases, the energy cost increases. In addition, in the case of using a film forming apparatus such as a calendering apparatus using e.g., water as a temperature controlling solvent, if the temperature exceeds the temperature controlled by water, processing may not be made. Accordingly, the temperature at which the processable elastic modulus range can be obtained (the temperature at which the storage elastic modulus of the composition is 100 kPa, is also referred to as “softening temperature”) is preferably 100° C. or less and more preferably 70 to 100° C. and further preferably 85 to 98° C.

The storage elastic modulus of a resin composition can be measured by a dynamic viscoelasticity tester, for example, RPA-2000 (manufactured by Alpha Technology Co., Ltd.).

In the case of a resin composition containing m-LLDPE alone as a resin component, the temperature at which the processable elastic modulus range can be obtained is 100° C. or less and a processable temperature range is 3.5° C. or more. These are acceptable ranges for calendering. In contrast, in the resin composition having LDPE blended therein for reducing a resin cost or controlling physical properties, the processable elastic modulus range exceeds 100° C. depending upon the weight average molecular weights of m-LLDPE and LDPE and the blending ratio thereof (as described later in Examples) and processability may be lower than the case of m-LLDPE alone. In this case, transparency of the resultant solar cell sealing film may reduce.

In the present invention, m-LLDPE and LDPE having the aforementioned weight average molecular weights are used in a composition for a solar cell sealing film in the blending ratio within the above range. Owing to the constitution, even if m-LLDPE and LDPE are blended, processability equivalent to a composition containing m-LLDPE alone can be obtained. Even if a film is formed by calendering, the film can be easily formed and the resultant solar cell sealing film has transparency equivalent to the case of containing m-LLDPE alone.

In the present invention, the weight average molecular weight of m-LLDPE is preferably 100,000 to 200,000 and further preferably 100,000 to 170,000. The weight average molecular weight of LDPE is preferably 50,000 to 250,000 and further preferably 80,000 to 250,000. When m-LLDPE and LDPE each satisfy the weight average molecular weight of the aforementioned range, a composition having further higher processability can be obtained. The smaller the difference in weight average molecular weight between them, the more preferable. The mass ratio of m-LLDPE to LDPE (m-LLDPE:LDPE) in the above composition is preferably 40:60 to 30:70 and further preferably 50:50 to 30:70. If the ratio of inexpensive LDPE increases, the cost of the resin can be further reduced.

In the present invention, it is preferred that the ratio (M_(w(LDPE))/M_(n(LDPE))), which is the ratio of the weight average molecular weight of the LDPE (M_(w(LDPE))) to the number average molecular weight (M_(n(LDPE))) thereof (in short, the molecular weight distribution of LDPE) is 1.0 or more as large as the ratio (M_(w(m-LLDPE))/M_(n(m-LLDPE))), which is the ratio of the weight average molecular weight of m-LLDPE (M_(w(m-LLDPE))) to the number average molecular weight of m-LLDPE (M_(n(m-LLDPE))) (in short, the molecular weight distribution of m-LLDPE). Since the molecular weight distribution of m-LLDPE is generally narrow, the temperature range at which elastic modulus changes tends to be narrow. Accordingly, it is better that the molecular weight distribution of LDPE is wider to the extent as described above because the aforementioned processable temperature range can be broadened and processability can be further improved.

The ratio (M_(w(LDPE))/M_(n(LDPE))), which is the ratio of the weight average molecular weight of LDPE (M_(w(LDPE))) to the number average molecular weight (M_(n(LDPE))) thereof, is preferably 3.30 or more, more preferably 3.30 to 10.0 and further preferably 3.30 to 8.00. The ratio (M_(w(m-LLDPE))/M_(n(m-LLDPE))), which is the ratio of the weight average molecular weight of the m-LLDPE (M_(w(m-LLDPE))) to the number average molecular weight (M_(n(m-LLDPE))) thereof, is preferably 2.25 or less, more preferably 1.50 to 2.25 and further preferably 2.00 to 2.25.

The weight average molecular weights (M_(w)) of LDPE and m-LLDPE and the number average molecular weights (M_(n)) thereof can be obtained based on measurement using high temperature GPC (gel permeation chromatography (HLC-8121GPC/HT, manufactured by Tohso Corporation), TSKgel GMH_(HR)-H (20) HT as a column and 1,3,5-trichlorobenzene as a solvent at a measurement temperature of 145° C.

Since the composition for a solar cell sealing film of the present invention contains highly crystalline LDPE having large crystals, crystals are observed in the composition. However, as the size of the crystals decreases, the transparency of the resultant solar cell sealing film improves. The average diameter of crystals in the composition is preferably 1.0 μm or less, more preferably 0.4 μm or less and further preferably 0.1 μm or less. Furthermore, the degree of crystallization of the composition of the present invention is preferably 50% or less, more preferably 45% or less and further preferably 40% or less. As described later, the composition of the present invention contains an organic peroxide, which forms crosslinkage when the composition is used as a solar cell sealing film; however, the average diameter of crystals and degree of crystallization mentioned above represent those of the composition before crosslinkage is formed.

The average diameter of crystals can be obtained as a circle-equivalent diameter, which is obtained by subjecting a photograph of an image of a section of a resin composition (sectioned by a microtome) magnified by a transmission electron microscope or a photograph of a section of a resin composition obtained by elastic modulus mapping by AFM (atom force microscope) to analysis using image processing software (Winroof) (manufactured by MITANI CORPORATION). The degree of crystallization can be obtained by DSC (differential scanning calorimeter) (manufactured by TA Instruments) at a temperature increasing rate of 10° C./minute.

The materials of the composition of the present invention will be more specifically described below.

[Ethylene-α-Olefin Copolymer (m-LLDPE) Polymerized Using a Metallocene Catalyst]

The m-LLDPE contained in the composition of the present invention may be an ethylene-α-olefin copolymer (including e.g., a terpolymer) having an ethylene derived structural unit as a main component and further a single or a plurality of structural units derived from an α-olefin having 3 to 12 carbon atoms such as propylene, 1-butene, 1-hexene, 1-octene, 4-methylpentene-1,4-methyl-hexene-1 and 4,4-dimethyl-pentene-1 as long as it has the aforementioned weight molecular weight and preferably the aforementioned molecular weight distribution. Examples of the ethylene-α-olefin copolymer include an ethylene-1-butene copolymer, an ethylene-1-octene copolymer, an ethylene-4-methyl-pentene-1 copolymer, an ethylene-butene-hexene terpolymer, an ethylene-propylene-octene terpolymer and an ethylene-butene-octene terpolymer. The content of α-olefin in the ethylene-α-olefin copolymer is preferably 5 to 40% by mass, more preferably 10 to 35% by mass and further preferably 15 to 30% by mass. If the content of α-olefin is low, flexibility and impact resistance of the resultant solar cell sealing film may not be sufficient. In contrast, if the content of α-olefin is excessive, the heat resistance may decrease.

As the metallocene catalyst for use in polymerization of m-LLPDE, a metallocene catalyst known in the art may be used and the metallocene catalyst is not particularly limited. A metallocene catalyst is generally a complex of a metallocene compound, which is a compound having a structure obtained by sandwiching a transition metal such as titanium, zirconium and hafnium between unsaturated cyclic compounds of a cyclopentadienyl group or a substituted cyclopentadienyl group of the R electron system, and a cocatalyst such as an aluminum compound including alkylaluminoxane, alkylaluminum, aluminum halide and alkylaluminum halide. The metallocene catalyst has a homogeneous active spot (single site catalyst) and usually can provide a polymer having a narrow molecular weight distribution and having virtually the same comonomer content per molecule.

In the present invention, the density of m-LLDPE (based on JIS K 7112, the same shall apply below), which is not particularly limited, is preferably 0.860 to 0.930 g/cm³. The melt flow rate (MFR) (based on JIS-K7210) of m-LLDPE, which is not particularly limited, is preferably 1.0 g/10 minutes or more, more preferably 1.0 to 50.0 g/10 minutes and further preferably 3.0 to 30.0 g/10 minutes. Note that MFR is determined at 190° C. and at a load of 21.18 N.

In the present invention, a commercially available m-LLDPE can also be used. Examples thereof include HARMOREX series and KERNEL series manufactured by Japan Polyethylene Corporation; Evolue series manufactured by Prime Polymer Co., Ltd.; and EXCELLEN GMH and EXCELLEN FX series manufactured by SUMITOMO CHEMICAL Co., Ltd.

[Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE)]

As the LDPE contained in the composition of the present invention, any LDPE may be used as long as it has the aforementioned weight average molecular weight, and preferably the aforementioned molecular weight distribution. LDPE generally has a long branched chain, which is obtained by polymerization of ethylene in the presence of a radical generator such as an organic peroxide at a high pressure of 100 to 350 MPa.

In the present invention, the density of LDPE (based on JIS K 7112), which is not particularly limited, is preferably 0.910 to 0.930 g/cm³. The melt flow rate (MFR) (based on JIS-K7210) of LDPE, which is not particularly limited, is preferably 1.0 g/10 minutes or more, more preferably 1.0 to 150.0 g/10 minutes and further preferably 20.0 to 140.0 g/10 minutes. Note that MFR is determined at 190° C. and at a load of 21.18 N.

In the present invention, a commercially available LDPE can also be used. Examples thereof include UBE polyethylene series manufactured by Ube Maruzen Co., Ltd., low-density polyethylene series manufactured by QAPCO, PETROSEN series manufactured by Tohso Corporation and SUMIKATHENE series manufactured by SUMITOMO CHEMICAL Co., Ltd.

[Organic Peroxide]

It is preferable that the composition for a solar cell sealing film of the present invention further contain an organic peroxide. When the composition is used for forming a solar cell sealing film, crosslinkage of polyethylene can be formed by heating the organic peroxide. Due to this, the transparency of the solar cell sealing film can be further improved. This is considered because the crystallinity of polyethylene changes by formation of crosslinkage, with the result that the degree of crystallinity usually decreases and the average diameter of crystals reduces.

As the organic peroxide, any organic peroxide can be used as long as it is decomposed at a temperature of 100° C. or more to generate radicals. Generally, the organic peroxide is selected in consideration of temperature for film formation, conditions for preparing a composition, curing temperature and heat resistance and storage stability of a material to be sealed. Particularly, an organic peroxide having a decomposition temperature of 70° C. or more at a half-life period of 10 hours is preferable.

Examples of the organic peroxide include dicumylperoxide, 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(tert-butylperoxy)hexane, 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(2-ethylhexanoylperoxy)hexane, 1-cyclohexyl-1-methylethylperoxy-2-ethylhexanoate, tert-hexylperoxy-2-ethylhexanoate, 4-methylbenzoylperoxide, tert-butylperoxy-2-ethylhexanoate, benzoylperoxide, 1,1-bis(tert-butylperoxy)-2-methylcyclohexane, 1,1-bis(tert-hexylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane, 1,1-bis(tert-hexylperoxy)cyclohexane, 1,1-bis(tert-butylperoxy)-3,3,5-trimethylcyclohexane, 1,1-bis(tert-butylperoxy)cyclohexane, 2,2-bis(4,4-di-tert-butylperoxycyclohexyl)propane, 1,1-bis(tert-butylperoxy)cyclododecane, tert-hexylperoxyisopropylmonocarbonate, tert-butylperoxymaleic acid, tert-butylperoxy-3,3,5-trimethylhexane, tert-butylperoxylaurate, 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(methylbenzoylperoxy)hexane, tert-butylperoxyisopropylmonocarbonate, tert-butylperoxy-2-ethylhexylmonocarbonate, tert-hexylperoxybenzoate and 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(benzoylperoxy)hexane.

As the organic peroxide, 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(tert-butylperoxy)hexane is particularly preferable. Due to this, a solar cell sealing film having excellent transparency and high insulation property can be obtained.

The content of the organic peroxide, which is not particularly limited, is preferably 0.1 to 5 parts by mass and more preferably 0.2 to 3 parts by mass based on 100 parts by mass of the resin component (total of m-LLDPE and LDPE).

[Other Components]

As long as the effects of the invention are not damaged, the composition of the present invention may contain other polymers such as a linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE) and, if necessary, additives such as a crosslinking aid (a compound having a radically polymerizable group as a functional group, for example, triallylcyanurate, triallylisocyanurate), an adhesion improver (e.g., a silane coupling agent), a plasticizer, a UV absorber, a light stabilizer, an antioxidant, an acryloxy group containing compound, a methacryloxy group containing compound and/or an epoxy group containing compound in order to improve or control various physical properties (mechanical strength, adhesive property, optical characteristics such as transparency, heat resistance, lightfastness, crosslinking rate).

[Method for Producing Composition for Solar Cell Sealing Film]

The composition for a solar cell sealing film of the present invention may be produced in any manner. Usually, the composition is produced by adding m-LLDPE and LDPE, and, if necessary the aforementioned materials in e.g., a super mixer (fast-flow mixer), a twin screw kneader, a kneader of a planetary gear mechanism or a single screw extruder, and kneading them. The conditions for kneading are not particularly limited; however, kneading is preferably performed at a shearing speed of 10 to 1500 s⁻¹, further preferably 100 to 1000 s⁻¹, and particularly preferably 200 to 800 s⁻¹. As the temperature condition particularly in the case of a composition comprising an organic peroxide, the temperature at which the organic peroxide does not react or rarely reacts, is preferable. The temperature condition is preferably 70 to 130° C. and further preferably 80 to 120° C.

In the case where an organic peroxide and other additives are blended, a method in which additives (part or the whole) are kneaded with a part of a resin component (m-LLDPE and/or LDPE) to prepare a masterbatch and thereafter, the masterbatch and the remaining resin component(s) (and if necessary the remaining additives) are blended such that the additives are contained in predetermined amounts, can be used.

Particularly in the case where a composition comprising an organic peroxide is produced, a production method including a step of preparing a masterbatch by mixing an organic peroxide with LDPE and a step of mixing the masterbatch and m-LLDPE, is preferably used. When a solar cell sealing film is produced from the obtained composition, since the organic peroxide mainly acts on easily crystallized LDPE, the degree of crystallization can be efficiently reduced, with the result that a composition, which can provide a solar cell sealing film further excellent in transparency, can be produced.

In the production method mentioned above, a predetermined amount of an organic peroxide may be wholly added to LDPE to prepare a masterbatch and then mixed with m-LLDPE; or a predetermined amount of an organic peroxide may be partially added to LDPE to prepare a masterbatch and the remaining organic peroxide may be added when the masterbatch is mixed with m-LLDPE. Alternatively, an organic peroxide, LDPE and m-LLDPE may be simultaneously mixed.

[Solar Cell Sealing Film]

The solar cell sealing film of the present invention can be obtained by forming a film from the composition for a solar cell sealing film of the present invention.

The solar cell sealing film of the present invention can be produced by subjecting the composition of the present invention, if necessary, to secondary kneading such as a roll kneading, and then subjected to a film-formation by extrusion or calendering generally employed to obtain a sheet. Particularly, a film is preferably formed by calendering. This is because the composition of the present invention having satisfactory processability (i.e., easy-to-form a film) even by calendering is used. The heating temperature during film formation, particularly in the case of comprising an organic peroxide, is preferably a temperature at which an organic peroxide does not react or rarely reacts, more specifically, 50 to 90° C., and particularly 40 to 80° C. The thickness of a solar cell sealing film is not particularly limited and can be appropriately set. The thickness is generally in the range of 50 μm to 2 mm.

Since the solar cell sealing film of the present invention is produced from the composition of the present invention, more specifically, since LDPE is mixed with m-LLDPE, cost of the resin materials is reduced and the transparency and processability are equivalent to those obtained in the case of containing m-LLDPE alone. Thus, the solar cell sealing film of the present invention is a solar cell sealing film having high in quality and low in cost.

[Solar Cell Module]

In the production of a solar cell module using the solar cell sealing film of the present invention, the solar cell module is usually produced by interposing the solar cell sealing film of the present invention between a front side transparent protecting member and a backside protecting member and allowing them to adhere into one body, thereby sealing solar cells. To sufficiently seal the solar cells, it is sufficient that a front side transparent protecting member, a front side sealing film, solar cells, a backside sealing film and a backside protecting member are stacked in this order; the layers are preparatorily pressed under reduced pressure to adhere; the remaining air between the layers is removed; and the sealing films are heated and pressed to adhere. In this case, if the composition of the present invention contains an organic peroxide, the sealing film can be cured by crosslinking. Note that, in the present invention, the side of a solar cell to which light is applied (light receiving side) is referred to as a “front side”; whereas the opposite side to the light-receiving side of the solar cell is referred to as a “backside”.

A solar cell module is produced, for example, by stacking a front side transparent protecting member 11, a front side sealing film 13A, solar cells 14, a backside sealing film 13B and a backside protecting member 12, as shown in FIG. 1; and curing the sealing films 13A and 13B by crosslinking (in the case that a sealing film composition contains an organic peroxide) in accordance with a conventional method such as heating and pressurizing. In order to perform the heating and pressurizing, the stack may be heated and pressed, for example, by a vacuum laminator at a temperature of 135 to 180° C., further 140 to 180° C., particularly 155 to 180° C. for a deaeration time of 0.1 to 5 minutes and at a pressure of 0.1 to 1.5 kg/cm² for a pressing time 5 to 15 minutes. When the sealing film composition contains an organic peroxide, LDPE contained in the front side sealing film 13A and the backside sealing film 13B can be crosslinked during the heating and pressurizing step. The front side transparent protecting member 11, backside protecting member 12, and solar cells 14 are integrated into one body via the front side sealing film 13A and backside sealing film 13B. In this manner, the solar cells 14 are sufficiently sealed.

The solar cell sealing film of the present invention can be used as the sealing film not only for a solar cell module using a single crystal silicon based- or polycrystalline silicon crystal based solar cell modules (as shown in FIG. 1) but also for a thin-film solar cell modules such as a thin-film silicon based solar cell module, a thin-film amorphous silicon based solar cell module and a copper indium selenide (CIS) based solar cell module. In this case, a structure obtained by forming a thin-film solar cell element layer on a surface of a front side transparent protecting member such as a glass substrate, a polyimide substrate and a fluororesin-based transparent substrate by e.g., a chemical vapor deposition method, and stacking a backside sealing film and a backside protecting member, thereby allowing them to adhere into one body; a structure obtained by stacking a front side sealing film and a front side transparent protecting member on a solar cell element formed on a surface of a backside protecting member and allowing them to adhere into one body, or a structure obtained by stacking a front side transparent protecting member, a front side sealing film, a thin-film solar cell element, a backside sealing film and a backside protecting member in this order and allowing them to adhere into one body, can be mentioned.

It is satisfactory that the front side transparent protecting member 11 to be used in the present invention is usually a glass substrate formed of e.g., silicate glass. The thickness of the glass substrate is generally 0.1 to 10 mm and preferably 0.3 to 5 mm. It is generally satisfactory that the glass substrate may be chemically or thermally reinforced.

As the backside protecting member 12 to be used in the present invention, a plastic film such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is preferably used. Furthermore, in consideration of heat resistance and heat/humidity resistance, a poly(ethylene fluoride) film, in particular, a laminate film obtained by laminating a poly(ethylene fluoride) film/Al/poly(ethylene fluoride) film in this order may be used.

EXAMPLES

The present invention will be described by way of Examples, below.

Examples 1 to 9, Comparative Examples 1 to 4

m-LLDPE and LDPE having physical properties shown in Table 1 were kneaded by a Labo Plasto mill (manufactured by TOYO SEIKI KOGYO Co. Ltd.) in the kneading conditions shown in Table 1 to prepare m-LLDPE and LDPE mixed compositions according to Examples 1 to 9 and Comparative Examples 1 to 4. The resin materials are as follows.

m-LLDPE (1): KS240T (manufactured by Japan Polyethylene Corporation)

m-LLDPE (2): KS340T (manufactured by Japan Polyethylene Corporation)

m-LLDPE (3): KJ640T (manufactured by Japan Polyethylene Corporation)

LDPE (1): F120N (manufactured by Ube Maruzen Co., Ltd.)

LDPE (2): J2516 (manufactured by Ube Maruzen Co., Ltd.)

LDPE (3): MG70 (manufactured by QAPCO)

LDPE (4): PETROSEN 353 (manufactured by Tohso Corporation)

1.5 parts by mass of 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butylperoxy)hexane (PERHEXA 25B) was blended as an organic peroxide to each composition.

To evaluate processability of the compositions obtained, the softening temperature (at which the storage elastic modulus of the composition is 100 kPa) and processable temperature range (in which storage elastic modulus falls within 30 to 100 kPa) were obtained by RPA-2000 (manufactured by Alpha Technologies).

As the acceptance and rejection criteria, ⊚ was used in the case of a softening temperature of 70° C. or more and 95° C. or less, ◯ was the case of a softening temperature of higher than 95° C. and 100° C. or less, and X was the case of a softening temperature of higher than 100° C. A processable temperature range of 3.5° C. or more was indicated by ◯ and a processable temperature range of less than 3.5° C. by X.

With respect to the compositions obtained, the degree of crystallization (not crosslinked) was obtained by measuring the amount of heat by DSC (differential scanning calorimeter) at a temperature from 30° C. to 160° C., at a temperature increasing rate of 10° C./minute, obtaining a fusion enthalpy value from the obtained chart, dividing the fusion enthalpy value by fusion enthalpy value of 288 J/g (literature value) of a complete crystal and multiplying the product by 100. The average diameter of crystals was obtained as a circle-equivalent diameter by subjecting a photograph of an image of a section of a resin composition (sectioned by a microtome) magnified by a transmission electron microscope or a photograph of a section of a resin composition obtained by elastic modulus mapping by AFM (atom force microscope) to binarization using image processing software (Winroof) (manufactured by MITANI CORPORATION). Note that the degree of crystallization and the average diameter of crystals were obtained with respect to compositions (described later) having crosslinkage after application of heat.

To evaluate the transparency of the resultant sealing film, a film having a thickness of 0.5 mm was prepared from each composition. The film was sandwiched by two glass plates, treated with heat in an oven at a temperature of 150° C. for 15 minutes to form crosslinkage, and cooled. The permeability of the resultant film to light beam (having a wavelength; 400 to 1100 nm) was determined.

As the acceptance and rejection criteria, ⊚ was used in the case of a film having a light permeability of 90% or more, ◯ was the case of a film having a light permeability of 88% or more and less than 90% and X was the case of a film having a light permeability of less than 88%.

(Evaluation Results)

The evaluation results are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1 MFR (g/10 minutes) M_(w) M_(w)/M_(n) Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5 Example 6 Example 7 Composition m-LLDPE(1) 2.2 210,500 2.27 — — — — — — — (parts by mass) m-LLDPE(2) 3.5 194,000 2.03 80 50 30 — — — 50 m-LLDPE(3) 30 110,000 2.05 — — — 80 50 30 — LDPE(1) 1.2 255,000 3.28 — — — — — — — LDPE(2) 25 134,000 3.31 — — — — — — — LDPE(3) 70 249,000 7.95 20 50 70 20 50 70 — LDPE(4) 140 83,000 5.33 — — — — — — 50 Kneading Kneading temperature (° C.) 120 120 120 120 120 120 120 Rotation speed (rpm) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Crystal state Not Crystalline degree (%) 24 30 41 22 32 39 33 crosslinked Average crystal diameter 0.051 0.087 0.113 0.028 0.047 0.061 0048 (circle-equivalent diameter) (μm) Crystal diameter distribution 0.92 1.2 1.4 0.81 0.85 1.1 0.89 (standard deviation/average crystal diameter) Crosslinked Crystalline degree (%) 14 20 27 13 20 25 19 Average crystal diameter 0.035 0.041 0.049 0.029 0.032 0.044 0.04 (circle-equivalent diameter)(μm) Processability Softening temperature (° C.) 95 97 99 87 96 97 96 Evaluation of softening temperature ⊚ ◯ ◯ ⊚ ◯ ◯ ◯ Processable temperature range (° C.) 4 5.6 6.8 3.5 3.6 4.3 3.8 Evaluation of processable temperature ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ range Transparency Light permeability (400-1100 nm) (%) 90.9 90.5 90.1 91.3 91.1 90.2 90.7 Evaluation of light permeability ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ MFR Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative (g/10 minutes) M_(w) M_(w)/M_(n) Example 8 Example 9 Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Composition m-LLDPE(1) 2.2 210,500 2.27 — — 20 50 — — (parts by mass) m-LLDPE(2) 3.5 194,000 2.03 — — — — 20 20 m-LLDPE(3) 30 110,000 2.05 50 50 — — — — LDPE(1) 1.2 255,000 3.28 — — 80 50 — — LDPE(2) 25 134,000 3.31 — 50 — — 80 — LDPE(3) 70 249,000 7.95 — — — — — — LDPE(4) 140 83,000 5.33 50 — — — — 80 Kneading Kneading temperature (° C.) 120 120 120 120 120 120 Rotation speed (rpm) 60 60 60 60 60 60 Crystal state Not Crystalline degree (%) 33 31 44 42 32 32 crosslinked Average crystal diameter 0.045 0.05 1.9 1.6 1.5 1.4 (circle-equivalent diameter) (μm) Crystal diameter distribution 0.84 0.9 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.3 (standard deviation/average crystal diameter) Crosslinked Crystalline degree (%) 20 22 31 27 27 26 Average crystal diameter 0.032 0.035 0.74 0.62 0.53 0.45 (circle-equivalent diameter)(μm) Processability Softening temperature (° C.) 94 95 106 105 104 103 Evaluation of softening temperature ⊚ ⊚ X X X X Processable temperature range (° C.) 3.6 3.8 8.6 7.2 6.9 6.2 Evaluation of processable temperature ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ ◯ range Transparency Light permeability (400-1100 nm) (%) 91.0 90.8 86.7 86.3 85.7 85.2 Evaluation of light permeability ⊚ ⊚ X X X X

As shown in Table 1, the composition of each of Examples 1 to 9 containing m-LLDPE having a weight average molecular weight of 200,000 or less and LDPE having a weight average molecular weight of 250,000 or less in a mass ratio (m-LLDPE:LDPE) in the range of 80:20 to 30:70, has a softening temperature of 70 to 100° C. and a processable temperature range of 3.5° C. or more and provided a solar cell sealing film having a light permeability of 90% or more and satisfied an acceptable evaluation result on every item.

In contrast, the compositions of Comparative Examples 1, 3 and 4 having a mass ratio (m-LLDPE:LDPE) of 20:80 and the composition of Comparative Example 2 having a mass ratio of 50:50, a weight average molecular weight of the m-LLDPE in excess of 200,000 and a weight average molecular weight of the LDPE in excess of 250,000 had unacceptable softening temperature and transparency.

Examples 10 to 14

Then, the inventors investigated on a method for producing a preferable composition in blending an organic peroxide. First, masterbatches A to D were prepared by blending an organic peroxide (2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butylperoxy)hexane) (PERHEXA 25B) into m-LLDPE or LDPE shown in Table 2. Subsequently, each of the masterbatches was mixed with the remaining resin components in the formulation shown in Table 3 to prepare compositions. The sealing films were prepared and heated to form crosslinkage in the same manner as above in order to evaluate transparency, and light permeability thereof was determined. Degree of crystallization and the average diameter of crystals were obtained with respect to a composition after crosslinkage was formed in the same manner as above.

TABLE 2 MFR (g/10 minutes) M_(w) M_(p) A B C D Formulation m-LLDPE(2) 3.5 194,000 165,000 — — — 100 LDPE(3) 70 249,000 73,000 100 100 100 — Organic — — — 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 peroxide

TABLE 3 MFR (g/10 Example Example Example Example Example minutes) M_(w) M_(p) 10 11 12 13 14 Formulation m-LLDPE(2) 3.5 194,000 165,000 50 50 50 50 (parts by LDPE(3) 70 249,000 73,000 — — — 50 50 mass) Masterbatch A — — — 50 — — — — Masterbatch B — — — — 50 — — — Masterbatch C — — — — — 50 — — Masterbatch D — — — — — — — 50 Organic — — — 1.25 1 — 1.5 — peroxide Kneading Kneading temperature (° C.) 120 120 120 120 120 Rotation speed (rpm) 60 60 60 60 60 Crystal state Crosslinked Crystalline degree (%) 25 24 22 29 31 Average crystal diameter 0.034 0.031 0.029 0.042 0.061 (circle-equivalent diameter) (μm) Transparency Light permeability (400-1100 nm) (%) 90.0 91.0 92.0 89.0 88.0 Evaluation of light permeability ⊚ ⊚ ⊚ ◯ ◯

As shown in Table 3, after masterbatches A to C were prepared by blending the whole or part of the addition amount of the organic peroxide into LDPE and masterbatches A to C were mixed with m-LLDPE to obtain compositions of Examples 10 to 12. A composition of Example 13 was prepared by mixing the whole amount of the organic peroxide simultaneously with mixing of m-LLDPE and LDPE. Masterbatch D was prepared by blending the organic peroxide into m-LLDPE and then it was mixed with LDPE to prepare a composition of Example 14. The compositions of Examples 10 to 12 were compared to the compositions of Examples 13 and 14, and it was found that the heated crosslinked films obtained had a higher light permeability and thus it was confirmed that solar cell sealing films having a higher transparency can be obtained.

The present invention is not limited to the constitution of the above embodiment and Examples and can be modified in various ways in the range of the substance of the invention.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

Owing to the present invention, it is possible to provide a solar cell sealing film and solar cell module high in quality and low in cost.

REFERENCE SIGNS LIST

-   11 Front side transparent protecting member -   12 Backside protecting member -   13A Front side sealing film -   13B Backside sealing film -   14 Solar cell 

1. A composition for a solar cell sealing film comprising an ethylene-α-olefin copolymer (m-LLDPE) polymerized using a metallocene catalyst and a low-density polyethylene (LDPE), wherein a weight average molecular weight of m-LLDPE (M_(w(m-LLDPE))) is 200,000 or less, a weight average molecular weight of LDPE (M_(w(LDPE))) is 250,000 or less, and a mass ratio of m-LLDPE and LDPE (m-LLDPE:LDPE) is in a range of 80:20 to 30:70.
 2. The composition for a solar cell sealing film according to claim 1, wherein the weight average molecular weight of m-LLDPE is 100,000 to 200,000 and the weight average molecular weight of LDPE is 50,000 to 250,000.
 3. The composition for a solar cell sealing film according to claim 1, wherein a ratio (M_(w(LDPE))/M_(n(LDPE))), which is a ratio of the weight average molecular weight of LDPE (M_(w(LDPE))) to a number average molecular weight of LDPE (M_(n(LDPE))), is 1.0 or more as large as a ratio (M_(w(m-LLDPE)))/M_(n(m-LLDPE))), which is a ratio of the weight average molecular weight of m-LLDPE (M_(w(m-LLDPE))) to a number average molecular weight of m-LLDPE (M_(n(m-LLDPE))).
 4. The composition for a solar cell sealing film according to claim 1, wherein a ratio (M_(w(LDPE))/M_(n(LDPE))), which is a ratio of the weight average molecular weight of LDPE (M_(w(LDPE))) to a number average molecular weight of LDPE (M_(n(LDPE))), is 3.30 or more, and a ratio (M_(w(m-LLDPE))/M_(n(m-LDDPE))), which is a ratio of the weight average molecular weight of m-LLDPE (M_(w(m-LLDPE))) to a number average molecular weight of m-LLDPE (M_(n(m-LLDPE))), is 2.25 or less.
 5. The composition for a solar cell sealing film according to claim 1, wherein an average diameter of crystals in the composition (not crosslinked) is 1.0 μm or less.
 6. The composition for a solar cell sealing film according to claim 1, wherein a temperature at which a storage elastic modulus of the composition is 100 kPa is 70 to 100° C. and a difference between a temperature at which the storage elastic modulus of the composition is 30 kPa and a temperature at which the storage elastic modulus of the composition is 100 kPa is 3.5° C. or more.
 7. The composition for a solar cell sealing film according to claim 1, further comprising an organic peroxide.
 8. The composition for a solar cell sealing film according to claim 7, wherein the organic peroxide is 2,5-dimethyl-2,5-di(t-butylperoxy)hexane.
 9. A method for producing the composition for a solar cell sealing film according to claim 7, comprising the steps of preparing a masterbatch by mixing the organic peroxide and the LDPE, and mixing the masterbatch and the m-LLDPE.
 10. A solar cell sealing film formed from the composition for a solar cell sealing film according to claim
 1. 11. The solar cell sealing film according to claim 10, wherein the film is formed by calendering. 